Section 108 requires the transfer to be in a Proper instrument
of transfer known as Share Transfer Form which is required to be presented to
the Registrar of Companies before it is signed and filled up by the transferor.
The Registrar will stamp or otherwise endorse thereon the date on which it is
so presented to him. However, the transfer form is not necessary in case of
transfer of securities effected through the depository as per the Depositories
Act, 1996.
A company shall not register a transfer of shares, unless a
proper instrument of transfer duly stamped and executed by the transferor and
by the transferee, has been delivered to the company along with the share
certificate. A reading of s.108 of the Companies Act, 1956 and s.12 of the
Indian stamp Act,1899, clearly shows that the instrument of transfer of shares
should bear the requisite stamps and the adhesive stamps should be cancelled at
the time of affixation of such stamps and execution of the document. If these
requirements are not complied with, then the
instrument, although bearing an adhesive stamp but not
cancelled, cannot be said to be an instrument 'duly stamped'. Accordingly,
transfer shall not be valid [Nuddea
Tea Co. Lt d. v. Ashok
Kumar Saha &+ Other s (1988) 64 Comp. Cas.775].
Time of stamping the
transfer-deed. Is it necessary that stamps be affixed before deed is
executed or they could be affixed anytime before delivery. ln Prafulla Kumar Rout v.
orient Engg. works (P) Ltd. (1986) 60 Comp. Cas. 65 (ori.) it was observed
that all that s.108 (IA) (b) requires is that before delivery the stamps should
be affixed and it does not require
the stamps to be affixed prior to execution of the documents.
However, in
Mathrubhumi Printing &+ Publishing Co. Ltd. a. Vardhaman Publishers Ltd. (1992) 73 Comp. Cas 80 (Ker), the
Kerala High Court observed:
If the instrument is not properly executed or the stamp
affixed to the instrument is not cancelled before execution or at least at the
time of execution, the said instrument must be deemed to be unstamped.
Cancellation of the stamps by the staff of the company does
not make transfer instrument duly stamped. The contention of the company that
stamps were cancelled by them (the company) before the Board of Directors
considered the transfer shall not be upheld as valid [Subhash Chander v. vardhman Spg. & Gen. Mills Ltd. (CLB Order dt. 12.11.1993)].
Lodging the transfer.
Every instrument of transfer completed in all respects, be delivered to the
company:
(i) in the
case of shares dealt in or quoted on a recognised stock exchange, at any time
before the date on which the Register of members is closed, for the first time
after the date endorsed by the Registrar or within 12 months from the date of
such endorsement, whichever is later;
(ii) in any
other case, within two months from the date of such endorsement.
Section 110 provides that the application for the registration of transfer may be made either by the transferor or the transferee. where it is made by the transferor and relates to partly paid-up shares, the company must give notice of application by prepaid registered post to the transferee. Lf the transferee does not object to the transfer within two weeks from the receipt of the notice, then his name may be entered on the register of members. With regard to an application by the transferee or by the transferor relating to fully paid-up shares, no such notice is required.
Section 110 provides that the application for the registration of transfer may be made either by the transferor or the transferee. where it is made by the transferor and relates to partly paid-up shares, the company must give notice of application by prepaid registered post to the transferee. Lf the transferee does not object to the transfer within two weeks from the receipt of the notice, then his name may be entered on the register of members. With regard to an application by the transferee or by the transferor relating to fully paid-up shares, no such notice is required.
Transfer of shares
held in joint names. In case of shares held in joint names, the transfer
form must be signed by all of them, unless a specific authorisation is made in favour
of any or some of them. Thus, in Shanta
G. Pommeret v. Sakel papers(p) Ltd. (1990) 69 Comp. Cas. 65(Bom.) where
though four persons were shown as transferors of shares, only three had signed
the shares, only three had signed the share transfer form and fourth had not
authorised the other to sign on his behalf, it was held, that transfer of
shares was not valid.
Transfer when
complete? Transfer becomes compete and the transferee becomes a
shareholder only when the transfer is registered in the
company's register [Mathrubhumi
Printing & Publishing Co. Ltd. o. Vardhaman Publishers Ltd. (1992)73 Comp.
Cas.80 (Ker.)].
No comments:
Post a Comment